Division
Total weight per head (g)
Daily mean of weight gain
per head (g)
Daily mean of feed intake
per head (g)
Feed conversion rate
Growth rate (%)
Control group
3.783
74.85
84.5
1.13
92
Experimental group (0.5%
addition of Macsumsuk
3.932
77.84
87.9
1.13
95
Physiochemical changes in the serum
Division
Total Cholesterol
Neutral fat
GOT
GPT
GLU
Amylase
IgG
Control group
112
143
336
3.4
233
745
4.5
Experimental group
103
141
286
1.7
232
784
5.23
Fatty acid composition of the breast meat
Division
Saturated fatty acid
Unsaturated fatty acid
Monounsaturated fatty acid
Polyunsaturated fatty acid
Control group
38.82
68
52
16
Experimental group
30.96
70
54
16
Analysis of the changes in the weight gain after 50 days of feeding
© Copyright since 2013 to 2014. Copyright and Trademarks: Visitors, web surfers and customers of our website are bound to
accept our copyright, trademarks, and registrations without limitations. No company, entity, website, or individual is permitted to use
any part of this website’s images, materials, codes, testimonials, product descriptions, or reviews for any of the following purposes
without a written and legally notarized permission from our company: gaining from advertisement or marketing for any of our
products; or using our product information or materials to market to other companies; or for search engines to place advertisements
on another website. Violation of our copyright carries liability to compensate us for all actual and potential damages, losses, and
violations. All rights are reserved.
Home About us Far-infrared Research Far-infrared Water Experiment Macsumsuk far-infrared Heating Mat Far-infrared Rays
Body far-infrared Reaction Macsumsuk far-infrared water balls Macsumsuk far-infrared heated waist belt Macsumsuk health
sheet Macsumsuk health cushion Growfeed E.G power far-infrared for livestock Macsumsuk far-infrared powder Macsumsuk
far-infrared growfeed anti-ammonia research Macsumsuk far-infrared health pillow Macsumsuk health waist belt Macsumsuk far-
infrared toothpaste Macusmsuk far-infrared laying hens research Macsumsuk far-infrared broilers hens research Macsumsuk
far-infrared pigs research Macsumsuk far-infrared fish and shrimp research Macsumsuk far-infrared growfeed research on
ammonia Samsung far-infrared bio TV research Macsumsuk far-infrared growfeed research on cattle Macsumsuk various
certificates and awards Macsumsuk manufacturer’s plant Macsumsuk company history Electrical cord plug guide Rcom Pet
pavilion Brooder Intensive Care for animals Rcom Automatic Eggs Incubator For Reptiles RFarm Indoor Hydroponic Plant
Growing System Rcom Brooder and Hatcher Intensive Care for Birds and Poultry
Rcom automatic Eggs Incubator for Birds and Poultry
Referral Dealers and Affiliates agreement Agreement Company vision Accepted payment method Privacy policy Shipping
services Warranty information Return and service authorization Contact us
= XML Sitemap Google Feed
Current Visitors:
Payment processed by PayPal using any credit card or electronic bank account. Note, you do not need
to be a member of our payment system. You can pay as a guest of PayPal. On PayPal payment final
step, you can change the default currency to the one you prefer.
For further questions, please, email us.
Macsumsuk Growfeed Research with Broilers Chicken
The Apostle’s Farm in the Philippines researched the
effects of Macsumsuk Growfeed (E.G. Power) mineral
from May 2010 to June 2010 on chicken ages 21 to 28
weeks. The experiment compared a control group which
did not receive the Growfeed (E.G. Power) mineral and
to an experimental group which received 0.5% of
Growfeed (E.G. Power) mineral added to their diet. The
experiment was performed on 100 laying chickens in
each of the two groups.
Results of the Experiment
The experimental group gained more weight more quickly than the control group.
The experimental group had lower values of total cholesterol in the blood as well as in GOT and
GPT tests of liver function.
The experimental group had higher concentration of IgG, which indicates the greater immune
system function.
The experimental group showed higher water-holding capacity, an indication of the meat quality,
than the control group.
The experimental group had higher unsaturated fatty acid than the control group whereas the
control group had higher saturated fatty acids.
